Luvi 2.14.0 fails to build with GCC 14.x for several reasons due to
too old lua-openssl 0.8.2-0 submodule:
TestLuvi/build/luvi-2.14.0/deps/lua-openssl/src/ocsp.c: In function 'openssl_ocsp_request_read':
TestLuvi/build/luvi-2.14.0/deps/lua-openssl/src/ocsp.c:124:29: error: passing argument 1 of 'PEM_ASN1_read_bio' from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
124 | OCSP_REQUEST *req = pem ? PEM_read_bio_OCSP_REQUEST(bio, NULL, NULL)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| |
| char * (*)()
Fixed in lua-openssl by [1].
TestLuvi/build/luvi-2.14.0/deps/lua-openssl/src/x509.c: In function 'openssl_push_general_name':
TestLuvi/build/luvi-2.14.0/deps/lua-openssl/src/x509.c:377:45: error: passing argument 2 of 'openssl_push_asn1type' from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
377 | openssl_push_asn1type(L, general_name->d.x400Address);
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~
| |
| ASN1_STRING * {aka struct asn1_string_st *}
Fixed in lua-openssl by [2].
TestLuvi/build/luvi-2.14.0/deps/lua-openssl/src/openssl.c: In function 'luaclose_openssl':
TestLuvi/build/luvi-2.14.0/deps/lua-openssl/src/stdatomic.h:387:9: error: implicit declaration of function '__c11_atomic_fetch_sub'; did you mean '__atomic_fetch_sub'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
387 | __c11_atomic_fetch_sub(object, operand, order)
Fixed in lua-openssl by [3].
Instead of fixing one by one each issues, update to the latest release
that include lua-openssl 0.9.0-0. Luvi v2.15.0 still have some GCC 14.x
issues, backport two additional patches.
Download luvi sources using git method since the release archive
no longer include the release version in its name [4].
Luvi switched to PCRE2 [5], update the optional dependency.
Update TestLuvi to select PCR2 package.
Fixes:
https://gitlab.com/buildroot.org/buildroot/-/jobs/11271124430 (TestLuvi)
[1] bfeedbe8c0
[2] e5b5420cc5
[3] cfcaa16d1a
[4] https://github.com/luvit/luvi/releases/download/v2.15.0/luvi-source.tar.gz
[5] https://github.com/luvit/luvi/releases/tag/v2.15.0
Signed-off-by: Romain Naour <romain.naour@smile.fr>
Signed-off-by: Julien Olivain <ju.o@free.fr>
As explained by Jörg [1], iteration with pairs() does not result in the
same order since luajit 2.1.
From [2]
"Table iteration with pairs() does not result in the same order?
The order of table iteration is explicitly undefined by the Lua
language standard. Different Lua implementations or versions may use
different orders for otherwise identical tables. Different ways of
constructing a table may result in different orders, too. Due to
improved VM security, LuaJIT 2.1 may even use a different order on
separate VM invocations or when string keys are newly interned.
If your program relies on a deterministic order, it has a bug.
Rewrite it, so it doesn't rely on the key order.
Or sort the table keys, if you must."
Note: The "luvi -v" return 255 even on success.
[1] http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/2021-November/627938.html
[2] https://luajit.org/faq.html
Signed-off-by: Romain Naour <romain.naour@gmail.com>
Cc: Francois Perrad <francois.perrad@gadz.org>
Cc: Jörg Krause <joerg.krause@embedded.rocks>
Signed-off-by: Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
