Because the way JavaScript project development is working the chances that your
project is using the same version of the buildroot package, and you provide
this library from `/var/www` to your users is actually really low ...
If you want to bundle JavaScript libraries in your project you should probably
either use a cdn, handle the package version and location of your choice in
your external or overlay, or just bundle it in your assets from a NPM workflow
to benefit from some minifications from your bundler.
Historically many of those JavaScript libraries were added in the 2010 eras
where it could make sense for them to be part of Buildroot.
Most of them are also way outdated/not maintained.
For more informations see https://elinux.org/Buildroot:DeveloperDaysELCE2025
Signed-off-by: Thomas Perale <thomas.perale@mind.be>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Because the way JavaScript project development is working the chances that your
project is using the same version of the buildroot package, and you provide
this library from `/var/www` to your users is actually really low ...
If you want to bundle JavaScript libraries in your project you should probably
either use a cdn, handle the package version and location of your choice in
your external or overlay, or just bundle it in your assets from a NPM workflow
to benefit from some minifications from your bundler.
Historically many of those JavaScript libraries were added in the 2010 eras
where it could make sense for them to be part of Buildroot.
Most of them are also way outdated/not maintained.
For more informations see https://elinux.org/Buildroot:DeveloperDaysELCE2025
Signed-off-by: Thomas Perale <thomas.perale@mind.be>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Because the way JavaScript project development is working the chances that your
project is using the same version of the buildroot package, and you provide
this library from `/var/www` to your users is actually really low ...
If you want to bundle JavaScript libraries in your project you should probably
either use a cdn, handle the package version and location of your choice in
your external or overlay, or just bundle it in your assets from a NPM workflow
to benefit from some minifications from your bundler.
Historically many of those JavaScript libraries were added in the 2010 eras
where it could make sense for them to be part of Buildroot.
Most of them are also way outdated/not maintained.
For more informations see https://elinux.org/Buildroot:DeveloperDaysELCE2025
Signed-off-by: Thomas Perale <thomas.perale@mind.be>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Because the way JavaScript project development is working the chances that your
project is using the same version of the buildroot package, and you provide
this library from `/var/www` to your users is actually really low ...
If you want to bundle JavaScript libraries in your project you should probably
either use a cdn, handle the package version and location of your choice in
your external or overlay, or just bundle it in your assets from a NPM workflow
to benefit from some minifications from your bundler.
Historically many of those JavaScript libraries were added in the 2010 eras
where it could make sense for them to be part of Buildroot.
Most of them are also way outdated/not maintained.
For more informations see https://elinux.org/Buildroot:DeveloperDaysELCE2025
Signed-off-by: Thomas Perale <thomas.perale@mind.be>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Because the way JavaScript project development is working the chances that your
project is using the same version of the buildroot package, and you provide
this library from `/var/www` to your users is actually really low ...
If you want to bundle JavaScript libraries in your project you should probably
either use a cdn, handle the package version and location of your choice in
your external or overlay, or just bundle it in your assets from a NPM workflow
to benefit from some minifications from your bundler.
Historically many of those JavaScript libraries were added in the 2010 eras
where it could make sense for them to be part of Buildroot.
Most of them are also way outdated/not maintained.
For more informations see https://elinux.org/Buildroot:DeveloperDaysELCE2025
Signed-off-by: Thomas Perale <thomas.perale@mind.be>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Because the way JavaScript project development is working the chances that your
project is using the same version of the buildroot package, and you provide
this library from `/var/www` to your users is actually really low ...
If you want to bundle JavaScript libraries in your project you should probably
either use a cdn, handle the package version and location of your choice in
your external or overlay, or just bundle it in your assets from a NPM workflow
to benefit from some minifications from your bundler.
Historically many of those JavaScript libraries were added in the 2010 eras
where it could make sense for them to be part of Buildroot.
Most of them are also way outdated/not maintained.
For more informations see https://elinux.org/Buildroot:DeveloperDaysELCE2025
Signed-off-by: Thomas Perale <thomas.perale@mind.be>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Because the way JavaScript project development is working the chances that your
project is using the same version of the buildroot package, and you provide
this library from `/var/www` to your users is actually really low ...
If you want to bundle JavaScript libraries in your project you should probably
either use a cdn, handle the package version and location of your choice in
your external or overlay, or just bundle it in your assets from a NPM workflow
to benefit from some minifications from your bundler.
Historically many of those JavaScript libraries were added in the 2010 eras
where it could make sense for them to be part of Buildroot.
Most of them are also way outdated/not maintained.
For more informations see https://elinux.org/Buildroot:DeveloperDaysELCE2025
Signed-off-by: Thomas Perale <thomas.perale@mind.be>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Because the way JavaScript project development is working the chances that your
project is using the same version of the buildroot package, and you provide
this library from `/var/www` to your users is actually really low ...
If you want to bundle JavaScript libraries in your project you should probably
either use a cdn, handle the package version and location of your choice in
your external or overlay, or just bundle it in your assets from a NPM workflow
to benefit from some minifications from your bundler.
Historically many of those JavaScript libraries were added in the 2010 eras
where it could make sense for them to be part of Buildroot.
Most of them are also way outdated/not maintained.
For more informations see https://elinux.org/Buildroot:DeveloperDaysELCE2025
Signed-off-by: Thomas Perale <thomas.perale@mind.be>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Because the way JavaScript project development is working the chances that your
project is using the same version of the buildroot package, and you provide
this library from `/var/www` to your users is actually really low ...
If you want to bundle JavaScript libraries in your project you should probably
either use a cdn, handle the package version and location of your choice in
your external or overlay, or just bundle it in your assets from a NPM workflow
to benefit from some minifications from your bundler.
Historically many of those JavaScript libraries were added in the 2010 eras
where it could make sense for them to be part of Buildroot.
Most of them are also way outdated/not maintained.
For more informations see https://elinux.org/Buildroot:DeveloperDaysELCE2025
Signed-off-by: Thomas Perale <thomas.perale@mind.be>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Because the way JavaScript project development is working the chances that your
project is using the same version of the buildroot package, and you provide
this library from `/var/www` to your users is actually really low ...
If you want to bundle JavaScript libraries in your project you should probably
either use a cdn, handle the package version and location of your choice in
your external or overlay, or just bundle it in your assets from a NPM workflow
to benefit from some minifications from your bundler.
Historically many of those JavaScript libraries were added in the 2010 eras
where it could make sense for them to be part of Buildroot.
Most of them are also way outdated/not maintained.
For more informations see https://elinux.org/Buildroot:DeveloperDaysELCE2025
Signed-off-by: Thomas Perale <thomas.perale@mind.be>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Because the way JavaScript project development is working the chances that your
project is using the same version of the buildroot package, and you provide
this library from `/var/www` to your users is actually really low ...
If you want to bundle JavaScript libraries in your project you should probably
either use a cdn, handle the package version and location of your choice in
your external or overlay, or just bundle it in your assets from a NPM workflow
to benefit from some minifications from your bundler.
Historically many of those JavaScript libraries were added in the 2010 eras
where it could make sense for them to be part of Buildroot.
Most of them are also way outdated/not maintained.
For more informations see https://elinux.org/Buildroot:DeveloperDaysELCE2025
Signed-off-by: Thomas Perale <thomas.perale@mind.be>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Because the way JavaScript project development is working the chances that your
project is using the same version of the buildroot package, and you provide
this library from `/var/www` to your users is actually really low ...
If you want to bundle JavaScript libraries in your project you should probably
either use a cdn, handle the package version and location of your choice in
your external or overlay, or just bundle it in your assets from a NPM workflow
to benefit from some minifications from your bundler.
Historically many of those JavaScript libraries were added in the 2010 eras
where it could make sense for them to be part of Buildroot.
Most of them are also way outdated/not maintained.
For more informations see https://elinux.org/Buildroot:DeveloperDaysELCE2025
Signed-off-by: Thomas Perale <thomas.perale@mind.be>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
This patch adds information on how to provides static JS libraries in
Buildroot with the release of the 2025.08.x version.
Because the way JavaScript project development is working the chances that your
project is using the same version of the buildroot package, and you provide
this library from `/var/www` to your users is actually really low ...
If you want to bundle JavaScript libraries in your project you should probably
either use a cdn, handle the package version and location of your choice in
your external or overlay, or just bundle it in your assets from a NPM workflow
to benefit from some minifications from your bundler.
Historically many of those JavaScript libraries were added in the 2010 eras
where it could make sense for them to be part of Buildroot.
Most of them are also way outdated/not maintained.
For more informations see https://elinux.org/Buildroot:DeveloperDaysELCE2025
Signed-off-by: Thomas Perale <thomas.perale@mind.be>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Due to the increasing number of patches applied for this package and the
lack of updates to fix the build issues as well as updating the version
to newer release. This patch removes softether from buildroot package
list.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Perale <thomas.perale@mind.be>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
This patch add several upstream patches that fix build error we are
experiencing on the autobuilder related to host-gcc15 and gcc14.
- 0010-use-bool-from-stdbool.patch
Fix a host-gcc15 error with C23 bool reserved keyword when building
host-softether package. This appeared on the autobuilder.
```
from Cfg.c:116:
../../src/Mayaqua/MayaType.h:257:33: error: 'bool' cannot be defined via 'typedef'
257 | typedef unsigned int bool;
| ^~~~
../../src/Mayaqua/MayaType.h:257:33: note: 'bool' is a keyword with '-std=c23' onwards
../../src/Mayaqua/MayaType.h:257:1: warning: useless type name in empty declaration
257 | typedef unsigned int bool;
| ^~~~~~~
```
- 0011-fix-implicit-declaration-of-function-getch.patch
Fix an implicit function declaration.
- 0012-vlanunix-fix-implicit-declaration-of-function-freetap.patch
Fix an implicit function declaration.
- 0013-fix-build-on-freebsd-version-140091.patch
Incompatible pointer type which appeared on the autobuilder as well:
```
Unix.c: In function 'UnixIgnoreSignalForThread':
Unix.c:324:25: error: assignment to 'void (*)(int, siginfo_t *, void *)' from incompatible pointer type 'void * (*)(int, siginfo_t *, void *)' [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
324 | sa.sa_sigaction = signal_received_for_ignore;
| ^
```
- 0014-cedar-hub-properly-set-value-for-hub-admin-options.patch
Fix an incompatible pointer type error.
- 0015-adjust-types-of-variables.patch
Fix an incompatible pointer type error which appeared on the autobuilder as
well.
```
Secure.c: In function 'OpenSec':
Secure.c:1829:56: error: passing argument 3 of 'sec->Api->C_GetSlotList' from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
1829 | if ((err = sec->Api->C_GetSlotList(true, NULL, &sec->NumSlot)) != CKR_OK || sec->NumSlot == 0)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
| |
| UINT * {aka unsigned int *}
```
- 0016-Cedar-Proto_IKE-fix-too-many-arguments-to-function-N.patch
Fix a function call.
Fixes: https://autobuild.buildroot.org/results/c43/c43a9a221896d37ee8a9d34c5b8e2725351c6eb5
Fixes: https://autobuild.buildroot.org/results/751/7517bb4d32c38d475d901769b0b2fd2c2f3dd543
Signed-off-by: Thomas Perale <thomas.perale@mind.be>
Acked-by: Bernd Kuhls <bernd@kuhls.net>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
An advanced terminal multiplexer with batteries included. Supports
layouts, floating and stacked panes, plugins, and customization.
Provides rich functionality out of the box.
Zellij is aimed at developers, operations-oriented users, and anyone who
loves the terminal.
https://github.com/zellij-org/zellij
Signed-off-by: Alexander Shirokov <shirokovalexs@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
The license is actually LGPL-2.1+.
Fixes: 006aab8d64 ("package/libplacebo: add libplacebo package")
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
This patch adds libplacebo package that is used
by mpv player.
libplacebo is the core rendering algorithms and
ideas of mpv rewritten as an independent library
and contains a large assortment of video processing
shaders, focusing on both quality and performance.
Signed-off-by: Javad Rahimipetroudi <javad.rahimipetroudi@mind.be>
Tested-by: Sen Hastings <sen@hastings.org>
[Bernd:
- bumped to v7.351.0
- moved Kconfig option to Multimedia (Sen)
- rebased patch 0001 after version bump
- added project URL to Config.in helptext
- removed redundancy in Config.in comment
- added comment to hash file
- switched _SITE to official repo
- added patch to fix build error with latest python3]
Signed-off-by: Bernd Kuhls <bernd@kuhls.net>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
lttng-modules fails to build in master and in our LTS branch
2025.02.x. Indeed, our LTS branch uses the 6.12 kernel as the latest
LTS, and lttng-modules in version 2.13.10 don't build with the 6.12
kernel:
BR2_arm=y
BR2_cortex_a9=y
BR2_ARM_ENABLE_VFP=y
BR2_TOOLCHAIN_EXTERNAL=y
BR2_TOOLCHAIN_EXTERNAL_BOOTLIN=y
BR2_LINUX_KERNEL=y
BR2_LINUX_KERNEL_USE_ARCH_DEFAULT_CONFIG=y
BR2_PACKAGE_LTTNG_MODULES=y
fails to build with 2025.02.x.
To fix this, let's bump to the latest point release in the 2.13.x
branch, which mostly contains fixes needed for the 2.13.x releases to
work with newer kernels. This is considered a reasonable bump for our
2025.02 LTS.
The hash of the license file is updated as the list of files under
each license has changed a bit, but that doesn't change the overall
list of licenses.
Fixes:
https://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/78d05ded97877f866d2bd7aa600a2dafa01bb364/
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Added patches (17.0.12+7 and 21.0.4+7) to allow compilation
without X11 support.
0003-autoconf-libraries-drop-the-need-for-X11-in-headless.patch
is only needed for 21.0.4+7, 17.0.12+7 already has this commit:
f97ec359ec
Next to that, add a new option BR2_PACKAGE_OPENJDK_X11,
to allow compilation with both head and headless support.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Devoogdt <thomas.devoogdt@barco.com>
[Thomas: split into two commits]
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
This commit fixes the wrong patch folders which should have been fixed
in commit 475c79d ("package/openjdk{-bin}: bump versions to 17.0.12+7
and 21.0.4+7")
Signed-off-by: Thomas Devoogdt <thomas.devoogdt@barco.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
The `utils/brmake` tool runs `make all` with logs put into `br.log`.
That file is therefore the result of a build and committing it never
makes sense, neither upstream nor on any other remote/branch.
⟩ git status --short
⟩ make beaglebone_defconfig
⟩ ./utils/brmake
⟩ git status --short
?? br.log
Add a new `/br.log` entry in the root `.gitignore` file.
Append to the end because no ordering logic was found.
Signed-off-by: Théo Lebrun <theo.lebrun@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
This makes it more obvious which service the PID file belongs to, and
thanks to the /var/run -> /run symlink fixes the check-package
warning.
Signed-off-by: Fiona Klute <fiona.klute@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
This brings the script in line with current standards, except the
expected PIDFILE value because changing the PID file path would
require changing build options.
The stop action now uses the PID file instead of "killall", and reload
is supported using SIGHUP (with limitations described in D-Bus
documentation). "--syslog" is added to the dbus-daemon arguments to
ensure log messages will be available, otherwise log messages after
fork may be lost.
Signed-off-by: Fiona Klute <fiona.klute@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
The "servicename" environment variable was never set, so the condition
in the "condrestart" case would always evaluate to false. Nobody seems
to have noticed since it was introduced with commit
ceb2859765 in 2007, so simply remove it.
Likewise, the comment in the stop function that mentions $servicename
is incorrect, there is no safety check to the "killall" call.
With those, remove the /var/lock/subsys/dbus-daemon file that was
created but never used.
Signed-off-by: Fiona Klute <fiona.klute@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
We need to set -Dprotobuf_BUILD_LIBUPB=ON for host-protobuf now
as some libupb headers now appear to be required.
Also set the new -Dprotobuf_LOCAL_DEPENDENCIES_ONLY=ON option
to ensure cmake doesn't try to download dependencies.
Signed-off-by: James Hilliard <james.hilliard1@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
